Anonymous
My feedback
13 results found
-
3,957 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
539 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,733 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
2,221 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
777 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,965 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,597 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,449 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
24,852 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedYes, there re WAY too many fakes profiles, especially here lately it has gotten extremely bad, but I disagree with linking, measuring, or validating using social media. Doing that would be an invasion of privacy on the user .... Would you really want to know that your dad, doctor, dentist, or preacher who has had to live the closeted lifestyle their entire life isn't as you and everyone else thought? Could you agime what it could do to their life, livelihood, or business?
-
4,169 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
5,012 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedWho says that the 25-35 year old gets to determine of the other gets messaged. Who says you get to violate the rule.
-
3,712 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
3,164 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
It would be great, but "Words can't be recalled, nor actions changed". The only way I could possibly agree with this would be ONLY if the message has not yet been viewed.