Anonymous
My feedback
13 results found
-
3,935 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
537 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,709 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
2,216 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
773 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,937 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,575 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,446 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
24,764 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedYes, there re WAY too many fakes profiles, especially here lately it has gotten extremely bad, but I disagree with linking, measuring, or validating using social media. Doing that would be an invasion of privacy on the user .... Would you really want to know that your dad, doctor, dentist, or preacher who has had to live the closeted lifestyle their entire life isn't as you and everyone else thought? Could you agime what it could do to their life, livelihood, or business?
-
4,129 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
4,973 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedWho says that the 25-35 year old gets to determine of the other gets messaged. Who says you get to violate the rule.
-
3,678 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
3,130 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
It would be great, but "Words can't be recalled, nor actions changed". The only way I could possibly agree with this would be ONLY if the message has not yet been viewed.