Scott Putesky
My feedback
15 results found
-
Give warnings of any violation
-
Screenshot_20220602-123555.png 182 KB -
Screenshot_20220602-123825.png 255 KB -
Screenshot_20220602-122233.png 601 KB -
Screenshot_20220528-091639.png 156 KB -
Screenshot_2022-04-18-08-03-19-68.jpg 154 KB -
Screenshot_2022-04-18-10-48-18-81.jpg 241 KB -
Screenshot_2022-04-18-10-49-31-86.jpg 291 KB -
BBB988CC-DFD6-445F-9341-0C835682F800.png 344 KB -
264108715_1817099222011111_2859248928019106044_n.png 99 KB -
3BECD44C-00F1-43E6-8A0F-A5E703A9BF3A.png 146 KB
1,257 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment Scott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
-
284 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
664 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
193 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
260 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
347 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
579 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
219 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
1,974 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
578 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
1,616 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
3,122 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
1,393 votesScott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
4,189 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Scott Putesky
commented
Agreed.
These so called "advanced" or "paid" features are simple and commonly available throughout applications. Placing such an unreasonably high $ price on features that are not inheritly scarce, innovative, unique nor important to all customers is a demonsration of their green driven business practices. The pricing model is absolutely bonkers and makes no sense. Despite being a well established app who should be mature enough to reap the benefits of continuous improvement & long term investment (and pass over savings to users), the pricing is exorbitant and inconsistent with other models (confusing users who compare Grindr's model to other efficient working models). Plus, user privacy/security is at high risk. So why pay them more for nothing? The platform is woefully underutilised.Scott Putesky
supported this idea
·
-
2,103 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Scott Putesky
commented
100% Completely agree with OP and the application of the term BULLSHIT is totally appropriate. Introducing this feature really nothing short of BS and the implications have been poorly considered by the Grindr DEV and business teams. Greed will be your downfall boys.
Scott Putesky
supported this idea
·
Warnings are a great idea! Many banned users are confused or unsure about what lead to their profiles being banned, and they lose many photos and resources in the process. Grindr's world class customer support has done very little relieve user concerns in this area. Introducing this feature would reduce their support inquiries/costs and provide greater guideline clarity to users and ultimately lead to much less frustration and resentment for the app (negative sentiments which are continually growing). This suggestion is EXCELLENT but you can only lead a horse to water, right?