Scott Putesky
My feedback
15 results found
-
Give warnings of any violation
-
Screenshot_20220602-123555.png 182 KB -
Screenshot_20220602-123825.png 255 KB -
Screenshot_20220602-122233.png 601 KB -
Screenshot_20220528-091639.png 156 KB -
Screenshot_2022-04-18-08-03-19-68.jpg 154 KB -
Screenshot_2022-04-18-10-48-18-81.jpg 241 KB -
Screenshot_2022-04-18-10-49-31-86.jpg 291 KB -
BBB988CC-DFD6-445F-9341-0C835682F800.png 344 KB -
264108715_1817099222011111_2859248928019106044_n.png 99 KB -
3BECD44C-00F1-43E6-8A0F-A5E703A9BF3A.png 146 KB
1,261 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
-
289 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
703 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
196 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
262 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
349 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
581 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
221 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
2,022 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
579 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
1,628 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
3,149 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
1,399 votes
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
4,225 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Scott Putesky commented
Agreed.
These so called "advanced" or "paid" features are simple and commonly available throughout applications. Placing such an unreasonably high $ price on features that are not inheritly scarce, innovative, unique nor important to all customers is a demonsration of their green driven business practices. The pricing model is absolutely bonkers and makes no sense. Despite being a well established app who should be mature enough to reap the benefits of continuous improvement & long term investment (and pass over savings to users), the pricing is exorbitant and inconsistent with other models (confusing users who compare Grindr's model to other efficient working models). Plus, user privacy/security is at high risk. So why pay them more for nothing? The platform is woefully underutilised.Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
-
2,111 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Scott Putesky commented
100% Completely agree with OP and the application of the term BULLSHIT is totally appropriate. Introducing this feature really nothing short of BS and the implications have been poorly considered by the Grindr DEV and business teams. Greed will be your downfall boys.
Scott Putesky supported this idea ·
Warnings are a great idea! Many banned users are confused or unsure about what lead to their profiles being banned, and they lose many photos and resources in the process. Grindr's world class customer support has done very little relieve user concerns in this area. Introducing this feature would reduce their support inquiries/costs and provide greater guideline clarity to users and ultimately lead to much less frustration and resentment for the app (negative sentiments which are continually growing). This suggestion is EXCELLENT but you can only lead a horse to water, right?