Anon Feedback
My feedback
14 results found
-
4,000 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
2,803 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anon Feedback
commented
Sniffies has now overtaken Grindr for my quality meetups. No women. No trans. Just guys.
It’s CHEAP too, like 80% cheaper and guys on there are real (some but def not as many bots or fake profiles) and they meet up more quickly. Plus, you can see the neighborhood where they live which is awesome because 5 miles away on Grindr can mean across a lake and a 30 min drive.
Grindr is just squeezing out cash from anyone who is horny. They don’t care about gay men as much as profit. If this wasn’t true, they might reinstate a gender filter in the app, but they actively decided not to do this. I’m going to stop my unlimited subscription soon. It’s not worth the hassle of all the fake profiles, flakes and constant need to block trans profiles.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anon Feedback
commented
Yes! ‘None of your beeswax!’ makes a valid point. This is our space. To not provide gay cis men their space is to pretend we’re not still marginalized. Respect us. We’re still fighting for our space
Anon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
1,122 votesAnon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
2,372 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anon Feedback
commented
This is exactly why we need age verification. This 17 year old just stated he allegedly had a conversation with his cop uncle who told him it’s okay to be on Grindr. It’s not. Not only is it against the TOS for using the app, but it presents several other issues including these two main points:
1) When the 17yo shares or receives a nude (federal law applies, not state). That can land someone in prison for a long time. Do not confuse age of consent with 2257/age of majority for nudity.
2) Instances where minors are on the app places the app at risk for being removed from Google/Apple store, and we all suffer. In addition to the Grindr’s TOS, the app stores have their own TOS, which doesn’t care about age of consent—they care about child p laws and 2257 compliance.
Anon Feedback
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Anon Feedback
commented
There are so many bots and I’m sure there may be some users on the app too early. Grindr MUST take action to validate its users for the safety of the grid! If it does not, the government will likely step in and pass legislation that may enforce more expensive or less ideal verification methods. It’s in Grindr’s best interest to protect users right now. Why are we even debating this?
-
1,921 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anon Feedback
commented
Let me change the damn sound
Anon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
3,907 votesAnon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
9,269 votesAnon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
254 votesAnon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
Double standards on profile picture
-
20220604_090252~2.jpg 4748 KB -
Screenshot_20220605-193835_Grindr.jpg 575 KB -
WhatsApp Image 2022-03-09 at 3.15.35 PM.jpeg 107 KB -
Screenshot_20220221-192018_Grindr.jpg 661 KB -
DE3202C4-750A-481E-9A6F-DFD2CCEAE16D.png 8076 KB -
17EF8489-63BE-4F97-8534-D74DC99F2025.png 6558 KB -
1298513E-F57E-4BC5-A8DA-988E62C68496.jpeg 253 KB -
9573239F-71BF-48BA-980A-F12E443D0BBF.jpeg 145 KB -
A98F0890-739E-4ABB-9AEB-9D2B0F490389.jpeg 61 KB -
2ED12C39-BEFE-455B-816A-205AE5825260.jpeg 352 KB -
IMG-20161013-WA0072.jpg 97 KB -
IMG-20161013-WA0072.jpg 97 KB -
IMG_20220130_220727417.jpg 1677 KB -
Screenshot_20220114-082251.png 1497 KB -
Screenshot_20220114-082307.png 813 KB -
Screenshot_20220114-082137.png 838 KB -
IMG_20200721_205114_BEAUTY_20211107_173115.jpg 1908 KB -
Screenshot_20220107_213600_com.grindrapp.android.jpg 801 KB -
Screenshot_20220107_213626_com.grindrapp.android.jpg 304 KB -
Screenshot_20211225-124349.png 625 KB -
20211026_142327.jpg 183 KB -
Screenshot_20200716-094234.jpeg 56 KB -
IMG_211223_130314.jpg 1242 KB -
E1146C55-ABCD-4A70-ADFA-4B785B4D2E7A.jpeg 569 KB -
5B13526C-35D3-4098-9475-FBD54CA37436.jpeg 287 KB -
6A6DE4B9-8EC5-41F8-8395-50FD659F41AA.jpeg 427 KB -
20180331_040444.png 607 KB -
E2EC739C-0979-4D22-8004-0B28803CC831.png 2328 KB -
1BA3192A-3FE7-424E-9604-6E1CE02CC414.png 1637 KB -
FDFC4003-838C-4D77-92C9-2349588EC663.png 1944 KB -
3C24DA00-E74D-45EB-AA9B-45DC0C3C49D2.png 1113 KB -
A9ADDA98-F310-4732-B68F-CDDFDBC01B7F.png 1235 KB -
B26B9DCA-6480-4075-BA75-D9A9DCF5EB21.png 865 KB -
487A4EC8-6DDF-436E-A1D2-A4BE82876843.jpeg 539 KB -
4766BD4C-AE6C-4503-A795-9676E153C2FA.jpeg 198 KB -
85CA0D87-0222-4BB2-9DB2-5288A04D932D.png 2036 KB
803 votesAnon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
-
180 votesAnon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
568 votesAnon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
3,003 votesAnon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
4,940 votesAnon Feedback
supported this idea
·
-
1,479 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anon Feedback
commented
A gender filter is NECESSARY and NOT discriminatory for two reasons; (1) it helps marginalized users find people they are most comfortable with and (2) it allows the grid to find people they are actually interested in meeting. Let’s make this happen!
Anon Feedback
supported this idea
·
I pay for unlimited at $340 USD per year! I just can’t justify it anymore. So many spam messages and the inability to filter out trans profiles (not my tea, but you do you).
I’m switching to sniffies.com and cancelling Grindr unlimited because Sniffies is significantly less expensive and easier to find guys.