I thought Grindr was not only sex-positive but also kink-positive?

I’m into ABDL, and also pupplay. With the former, I can’t upload a padded photo of myself without it going through moderation and being refused.

The photos being refused are of me (well above legal age) in a cute diaper, because that’s my thing; that’s it. It’s also a thing for lots of others on your platform, whether they publish photos related to it or not. No nudity, no minors, no breaking laws or guidelines.

It would be helpful to apply a little common sense to moderation, rather than alienating and de facto kink-shaming to a degree. Even for those whom it piques curiosity… don’t “ban” it without fair and reasonable cause, or at least justify the position to do so.

Grindr should not permanently ban users after 1 community guideline offense and then tell them they cannot provide a reason. First off, as a brand, this makes app users very skeptical. Secondly, there should at least be a two strikes rules or different levels of severity. I’m seeing numerous complaints from users that they were banned for no reason (as is my situation).

As marginalized members of society, we already don’t have the same privileges as others. To take away one of the only tools available to find a romantic partner without reason is unfair, against the core values of the Grindr brand, and against the very foundation that the application was built upon.

RE: Grindr Feedback page "VOTE" option should be YES (I agree) or NO (I do not agree)

This would/could help Grindr in decision making for a:
An absolute fix, new requirement or feature, bringing back functionalities, cost related complaints, current pain points, other issues, etc...

All VOTES would count and be based on REAL votes taken from a user/users.

An expiry date with the YES or NO decision noted can display, upon expired idea timeframe/voting timeframe.

If VOTE is expired, then both YES or NO boxes are not available for users.

Also maybe Grindr can send an alert to all or affected clients in a quick popup with a reasonable expiry and timeframe to VOTE via APP...

Grindr may be able to implement changes much faster based on VOTES taken - meeting the idea - the wants and needs of clients.

Refrain from the practice of showing or allowing users to type in their HIV status when they create their profile or when they have created the profile, if you care about the health of the users keep the option of reminding them to get tested after certain intervals, this creates stigma against lgbt men who are infected with the virus, we have encountered people who have written phrases on the 'about me' section like 'NO HIV POSITIVE MEN' this is very stupid because you can have sex with someone and how will you know if they do not have the virus and how sure are you that someone you are sleeping with is telling the truth, therefore this serves no purpose

please remove the about me option it is being abused by people who post HOMOPHOBIC, BODY SHAMING and RACIST things, we often bump into phrases like NO FAT PEOPLE,NO CHUBBY, NO GIRLY GUYS, NO BLACK/WHITE/INDIAN PEOPLE, NO FEMININE MEN, NO SISSY MEN BE MANLY, BE DISCREET, NO MEXICANS be this be that...this application is supposed to be a place inclusive of all people who are different but it serves an otherwise purpose. please vote to remove the about me option and rather replace it with a list of descriptions a person can choose from, these descriptions must leave no room for those who want to be homophobic or racist or to body shame but it must be a list of things a person can choose from.