Mike Crane
My feedback
23 results found
-
2 votes
-
59 votes
-
“Optional profile verification with blue tick badge to reduce fake profiles and improve user trust.”
16 votes -
40 votes
-
96 votes
-
94 votes
-
99 votes
-
459 votes
-
109 votes
-
35 votes
-
119 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
112 votes
-
156 votes
-
151 votes
-
180 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I actually support Grindr widening the umbrella, but most of the “females” are bot accounts and we get huge numbers of trans men and straight men who are trans chasers. If Match.com threw all users in a room and said “here’s your grid” it would be useless for hetros. But here we are with Grindr, where cis gay men should obviously be attracted to trans men and women, and cis straight men don’t seem to have any issues noting they only want trans. The solution is simple, like other dating sites: free filters that limit your grid to matching demographics on both sides: “I’m a cis gay man looking for cis gay men”. “I’m a cis bi man looking for gay cis men and trans women”. “I’m a trans man looking for a trans man”.
Easy logical filter that every other app which encourages multiple genders already has, but Grindr would rather enshitify the app and throw everyone in a room full of bots and gender mismatches and claim to provide a premium experience.
-
761 votes
-
330 votes
-
365 votes
-
1,035 votes
-
638 votes
Agreed. They widened the user base but made it more difficult to find matches. I’m X looking for Y should be core functionality when multiple genders are involved.