Skip to content

Byte Me! Communications

My feedback

10 results found

  1. 2,395 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Byte Me! Communications commented  · 

    The increasing number of profiles which are NOT of gay, bi or ‘straight’ MEN is becoming an issue for those of us who are not only seeking MEN, but paying for the privilege thru membership. Grindr’s headline is “ Gay Dating and Chat” however it is obvious that this is no longer true as it would seem Grindr is intent on being all things to all persuasions at the expense of alienating the very category it purports to cater for. There are numerous dating apps for our trans brothers and sisters, just as there are for our hetero brothers and sisters so it wouldn’t be cynical to assume that Grindr’s ever increasing ‘LGBTQI’ membership policy is more about membership fees than it is about inclusion. What’s next…polygamists, satanists, abstentionists animal lovers?

    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 
  2. 752 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,546 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,394 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 
  5. 97 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 
  6. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 
  7. 26 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 
  8. Have a way to filter out bots solicitation and scams

    24,873 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 
  9. 4,194 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 
  10. 348 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Byte Me! Communications commented  · 

    Started using Grindr as a non-paying member then got suckered into becoming an Xtra member believing the ‘features’ I was paying for were a given, only to find that some of those ‘features’ had been shifted over to a newer subscription model (i.e. UNSEND) costing considerably more $ again…what a bloody liberty! Add to this the ever increasing number of SPAM msgs and FAKE profiles redirecting members to external links not to mention the noticeable influx of trans/fem/tranny profiles clogging up the available number of seeable profiles to wade through, the overall Grindr ‘experience is fast becoming an utter insult for which members are paying for the privilege, especially when there are other social media platforms catering for those specifically seeking alternative gender types. If Grindr is to be seen as a genuinely gay male platform and not synically as just another grab for the gay dollar if not any dollar business model it would be well advised to consider the issues raised here, as polling of other Grindr members is showing that I am not the only member with these concerns/

    Byte Me! Communications supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base