Byte Me! Communications
My feedback
10 results found
-
2,395 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Byte Me! Communications supported this idea · -
752 votesByte Me! Communications supported this idea ·
-
1,546 votesByte Me! Communications supported this idea ·
-
1,394 votesByte Me! Communications supported this idea ·
-
97 votesByte Me! Communications supported this idea ·
-
12 votesByte Me! Communications supported this idea ·
-
26 votesByte Me! Communications supported this idea ·
-
24,873 votesByte Me! Communications supported this idea ·
-
4,194 votesByte Me! Communications supported this idea ·
-
348 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Byte Me! Communications commentedStarted using Grindr as a non-paying member then got suckered into becoming an Xtra member believing the ‘features’ I was paying for were a given, only to find that some of those ‘features’ had been shifted over to a newer subscription model (i.e. UNSEND) costing considerably more $ again…what a bloody liberty! Add to this the ever increasing number of SPAM msgs and FAKE profiles redirecting members to external links not to mention the noticeable influx of trans/fem/tranny profiles clogging up the available number of seeable profiles to wade through, the overall Grindr ‘experience is fast becoming an utter insult for which members are paying for the privilege, especially when there are other social media platforms catering for those specifically seeking alternative gender types. If Grindr is to be seen as a genuinely gay male platform and not synically as just another grab for the gay dollar if not any dollar business model it would be well advised to consider the issues raised here, as polling of other Grindr members is showing that I am not the only member with these concerns/
Byte Me! Communications supported this idea ·
The increasing number of profiles which are NOT of gay, bi or ‘straight’ MEN is becoming an issue for those of us who are not only seeking MEN, but paying for the privilege thru membership. Grindr’s headline is “ Gay Dating and Chat” however it is obvious that this is no longer true as it would seem Grindr is intent on being all things to all persuasions at the expense of alienating the very category it purports to cater for. There are numerous dating apps for our trans brothers and sisters, just as there are for our hetero brothers and sisters so it wouldn’t be cynical to assume that Grindr’s ever increasing ‘LGBTQI’ membership policy is more about membership fees than it is about inclusion. What’s next…polygamists, satanists, abstentionists animal lovers?