It's understandable that you'd want more flexibility when sharing your sexual health status, especially when it comes to maintaining honesty while also preserving privacy. Being transparent about health is important, but it's also natural to want a bit of discretion, especially in sensitive areas like dating. Speaking of dating, if you're looking to meet and hook up with like-minded people who value transparency and connection, you might want to explore hhttps://www.getnaughty.com/younger-women-older-men.html . It’s a space where singles can find real connections based on honesty and shared values. And just like being open about health, being open in relationships can lead to deeper, more meaningful connections.

Someone else commented on here "It is a manslaughter charge to sleep with some one who is negative and you're + and not protected or undetectable
Having those of us who are negative know is a requirement for the health act" and I think that missed the point of this post. People should still inquire about status and communicate clearly about status and take appropriate steps to ensure their safety, but requiring an HIV STATUS to be selected before you can save the last tested date doesn't have anything to do with that.

I was going to post the same thing. There are more things to be tested for than HIV, so having the date not save just because HIV STATUS is not entered is inappropriate. It's also bad user interface design: if you're going to require HIV STATUS in order to set a date, then just hide the date field unless an HIV STATUS is selected. But I'd prefer if the fields were just independent of each other so you can enter or not enter any combination of the two without a cross-check.

I'm glad someone else posted this as I was just about to post this as an idea. I thought you could do this already but was disappointed to find out they don't have this feature. This idea will be esp useful for those born with HIV and are gay but don't want to disclose yet still get tested.