Antonymous Q
My feedback
6 results found
-
3 votes
-
1,393 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
115 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Then they shouldn't be able to use the app my friend. Your privacy is not more important than my safety. All you "discreet" privacy freaks need to go back to cruising in the parks or woods. Or seek help for that paranoia.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment LMAO. Do you want Grindr to provide you with the mask too so you can prevent your hookup from knowing you're a fag? You closet dudes are such a waste of space.
-
2,389 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment They'll implement the change in about 2 years and pretend it was their idea all along. I don't have a problem with trans women. But the men looking for them are usually repugnant, especially since 40% aren't into t-women per se but rather need someone to boost their sense of masculinity or hide their homosexuality. Sans that, I'm ok with them keeping it the same. But I can always smell the closet cases vs the genuine bisexual or straight admirers. And frankly, I'd rather not see their pathetic faces, which are becoming more and more common (assuming they haven't blurred their pictures)
-
3 votes
Wouldn't make a difference. If there's one thing I'm learning is that these closet cases that are always "looking" will seek you out like a moth to a flame knowing full well they have nothing to offer you..You can spell it out in no uncertain terms that you're only looking for real shit and the dl sex pests will still be in your face. Until there is a serious backlash against the trashy dudes on this platform, it won't matter how compartmentalized things are. They will find a way to ruin your experience.