Eric Cord
My feedback
5 results found
-
1,504 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
4 votes
-
2,360 votes
-
9 votes
-
18 votes
I agree that some sort of filter should be provided without cost. Afterall, when Grindr started, it was a gay male seeks gay male app. No disrespect intended towards the trans community, those who are looking to date trans tend not to be looking for non-trans individuals. This tends to be true of those who are not seeking date trans, they tend solely seek trans. Being that the case, why not either allow a filter (those who choose to seek trans be only available to be seen by trans, as well as trans only available to be seen by those who are seeking trans).
I, speaking for myself alone and can't speak of others experiences, am not one who seeks trans individuals nor do I want to be contacted by trans (un-politically correct as that is, it a truth). Being on a dating/connection app/site is already a bit stressful, the hit and miss of contacting someone one might find attractive and wanting to get to know. This current situation, having to politely reject an individual due to something the App/Site could easily prevent by applying either a filter or category. Yet, Grindr users are still subjected to navigating an app which scrutinizes photos (no allowance of collages composed with one's actual physical appearance), yet allows Landscapes, objects such as vehicles, animals, cartoon. The app is plagued with AI/Adbots who try to solicit joining other sites, to purchase "steam card", or forward via CashApp. I guess, it's the price we pay.
Free FILTER please.