"I completely understand your comment Sanchizes. I know there are several situations to analyze, including development complexity, costs, etc. The point in question is to analyze and bring to the table what the users and clients want, right? What are they looking for? What are their wishes? What is possible to do right now? Is there a plan in place to address this? Anyway, it's just a suggestion."

The frustration is understandable, but the gap between votes and implementation usually isn't laziness — it's that the most popular request isn't always the most feasible, and a feature with 500 votes may require rebuilding core architecture. What tends to help is framing requests in terms of the problem they solve rather than the specific solution, because that gives product teams room to address the underlying need in a way that fits the roadmap. Also, closing the loop publicly on why something wasn't built builds more trust than silence. There's a discussion on https://gambleszen.ca about how user feedback actually shapes products versus how it's presented — the point about communication mattering as much as delivery was well-made. What was your top-voted suggestion?