Skip to content

RT3

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    RT3 commented  · 

    It's called aggressive monetization, and they do this intentionally well aware of the degradation of the UX (user experience).

    They know they're the top dogs within the LGBT dating apps, and they know despite how much shit they throw in, they have discerned that the mere prospect of getting a few bucks from you far outweighs the consequence of "user churn", when someone abandons a service due to deteriorating factors.

    So threats of departure won't really affect corporate decisions when their profit margin is so secure as to risk losing paying users. The baffling thing to me is the utter disregard for subscribed members including their trigger happy account bans without so much as an appeal process. It all seems very sloppy with issues emerging without consideration to bugs and other issues while haphazardly addressing the more critical concerns.

    The best and only thing to do and one I highly suggest others follow thru is establishing an ad block service via VPN or DNS or both and block the ads server traffic. Hit them where it hurts, their ad revenue stream. Also it should be obvious and go without saying but move to the myriad alternative apps. Grindr is only able to get away with this because users keep coming back because it's the one app everyone knows and use. Break the pattern and migrate to services that do not exploit monetizing every aspect of the UX as aggressive as these greedy bellend hacks.

    RT3 supported this idea  · 
  2. 943 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    RT3 commented  · 

    Cody, your posts are a masterclass in showcasing unyielding, closed-minded beliefs to the entire internet. Please, continue...your contributions might just propel humanity towards solving some of our deepest societal issues. Especially when people, so certain of their understanding of medical definitions and scientific publications, conveniently forget to source or reference any of it.

    I wasn't initially inclined to dignify your simplistic arguments with a response. But if it helps others grasp the complexities of this topic, then I'm all in.

    Let’s set the record straight, Cody: sexuality is a spectrum. It’s not the tidy, black-and-white categories you cling to. Reality is intricate, diverse, and far from your outdated, cookie-cutter stereotypes. As you stubbornly defend your rigid views, you’re not just revealing your narrow perspective, but also exposing a vein of deep-rooted discrimination cloaked in pseudo-intellectual language.

  3. 668 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    RT3 commented  · 

    The blatant discrimination is abhorrent. And to the one claiming that connecting with nothing but gay males leads to getting flagged for breaking community guidelines... I really do wonder if that was your own experience from having or making incendiary comments about certain groups in our community that you either are well aware of or are woefully unaware of your discriminatory nature.

  4. 22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    RT3 commented  · 

    This is the very definition of having something against trans people.

    I don't see what the big deal is given the acceptance for bi or straight-curious men, or even different ethnicities or other types you may not be into.

    If it's that much of an issue, you can always block profiles.

  5. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    RT3 supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base