I have a patent which could be used in conjunction with Grindr to allow STD verification. No one has the ability to remotely verify someone's identity, because it could be a desire for a user to share a profile. As disease control goes, that is unacceptable. However, you could have a profile and compare innumerable profiles to search for only those matches that compare favorably and then authenticate the individual using biometrics like an iris scan, face to face using my method: "system for scheduling, recordation, and biometric validation of interpersonal interactions," which is fully patented. It employs a variety of passive and active security mechanisms that will ensure that the gentlemen are all going home with the correct dude and it can be stored using biometric data that can't readily identify the men in question, even if the service is compromised. It far surpasses the security of state issued IDs for both user to user identification and I am going to be pursuing biometric identification between the user and the clinician acquiring the STD test samples from the user. No one can identify all the fake state IDs, but tightly linking test results to an iris scan is ideal.
I have a patent which could be used in conjunction with Grindr to allow STD verification. No one has the ability to remotely verify someone's identity, because it could be a desire for a user to share a profile. As disease control goes, that is unacceptable. However, you could have a profile and compare innumerable profiles to search for only those matches that compare favorably and then authenticate the individual using biometrics like an iris scan, face to face using my method: "system for scheduling, recordation, and biometric validation of interpersonal interactions," which is fully patented. It employs a variety of passive and active security mechanisms that will ensure that the gentlemen are all going home with the correct dude and it can be stored using biometric data that can't readily identify the men in question, even if the service is compromised. It far surpasses the security of state issued IDs for both user to user identification and I am going to be pursuing biometric identification between the user and the clinician acquiring the STD test samples from the user. No one can identify all the fake state IDs, but tightly linking test results to an iris scan is ideal.